Normal values of left ventricular functional indices in gated 99mTc-MIBI myocardial perfusion SPECT

Authors

  • Amirhosein Vejdani Department of Nuclear Medicine, Imam Reza Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
  • Mahdi Reza Emadzadeh Department of Cardiovascular, Imam Reza Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
  • Ramin Sadeghi Department of Nuclear Medicine, Imam Reza Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
  • Seyed Rasoul Zakavi Department of Nuclear Medicine, Imam Reza Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Abstract:

  Introduction: Although left ventricular(LV) function parameters measured by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT (GSPECT) have been validated, experimental data have revealed that the calculated the LV function parameters using GSPECT are affected by patient populations as well as particular acquisition and processing conditions. We tried to determine the normal values of GSPECT in an Iranian population.  Methods:  We studied 3500 Iranian patients who underwent GSPECT in an outpatient setting. To develop normal limits of LV functional indices using GSPECT, 148 patients with a low (<5%) likelihood of coronary disease and normal tomograms were selected.  No one of 148 patients had known coronary artery disease, typical angina, history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and smoking, any abnormality in echocardiography or hyperlipidemia. They were not taking any medication known to affect LV function at least 2 days before the study.  End diastolic volume (EDV), end systolic volume (ESV) and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) were calculated in rest GSPECT using iterative reconstruction and QGS (quantitative gated SPECT) software. Results: Mean EDV, ESV and LVEF were 53.8±20.2, 14.3±10.8 and 75.0%±9.6% respectively. These data showed a Gaussian distribution, so mean±2SD would show the upper or lower limits of normal for LV functional parameters. There were the marked sex differences in mean LVVs and LVEF measurements. BMI index had not effect on the measurement of the LV functional parameters. We noticed that 85.4% of our subjects had ESV<25 ml while most of them were women (112/123, 91%). Conclusion: From a clinical viewpoint, each institute should use a standard protocol for the specific patient population and for the mode of SPECT acquisition and reconstruction. Normal thresholds using GSPECT, OSEM reconstruction and QGS algorithm in men and women were EDV>130, ESV>55 & LVEF<52% and EDV>77, ESV> 26 and LVEF<62% respectively.

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

normal values of left ventricular functional indices in gated 99mtc-mibi myocardial perfusion spect

introduction: although left ventricular(lv) function parameters measured by gated myocardial perfusion spect (gspect) have been validated, experimental data have revealed that the calculated the lv function parameters using gspect are affected by patient populations as well as particular acquisition and processing conditions. we tried to determine the normal values of gspect in an iranian popul...

full text

Normal Values of Left Ventricular Functional indices in Gated Tc-MIBI Myocardial Perfusion SPECT

Introduction: Although left ventricular(LV) function parameters measured by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT (GSPECT) have been validated, experimental data have revealed that the calculated the LV function parameters using GSPECT are affected by patient populations as well as particular acquisition and processing conditions. We tried to determine the normal values of GSPECT in an Iranian popul...

full text

Dipyridamole stress and rest gated 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT: left ventricular function indices and myocardial perfusion findings

  Introduction: We investigated the difference in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and end-systolic volume(ESV) measured by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT (GSPECT) in the post-dipyridamole stress and rest periods, and compared the results with the perfusion patterns found in the conventional non-gated tomograms. Methods: 297 consecutive patients were studie...

full text

Diastolic left ventricular functional indices: Comparison between gated myocardial perfusion SPECT and echocardiography

Introduction: Many patients have only diastolic dysfunction without any abnormality in systolic function. We compared cardiac diastolic parameters obtained by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT (Gated SPECT) with those evaluated by echocardiography. Methods: Forty-nine patients (aged 37-85 years, 19 males and 30 women) underwent Gated SPECT and echocardiogr...

full text

assessment of correlation of left ventricular diastolic functional indices between gated myocardial perfusion spect and echocardiography

conclusions in this study there is no correlation between the main lv diastolic indices derived by spect and echocardiography, may be due to the main changes in the last version of guidline for assessment of lv diastolic function by echocardiography. results the population study consisted of 19 male and 30 female with the average age of 58.2 years.there is a mild negative correlation between pf...

full text

dipyridamole stress and rest gated 99mtc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion spect: left ventricular function indices and myocardial perfusion findings

introduction: we investigated the difference in left ventricular ejection fraction (lvef) and end-systolic volume(esv) measured by gated myocardial perfusion spect (gspect) in the post-dipyridamole stress and rest periods, and compared the results with the perfusion patterns found in the conventional non-gated tomograms. methods: 297 consecutive patients were studied with post-stress and rest 9...

full text

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later

Save to my library Already added to my library

{@ msg_add @}


Journal title

volume 16  issue 1

pages  14- 19

publication date 2008-11-01

By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023